Project your retirement corpus, annuity purchase, and estimated monthly pension from your NPS contributions.
Note: This is an estimate using monthly compounding for contributions (SIP future value) and a simple yield model for annuity.
A comprehensive comparison of OPS and NPS – features, benefits, and criticisms.
Pensions play a crucial role in providing financial security to government employees after retirement. In India, the system has undergone major reforms. Until 2004, the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) was applicable, but from 1st January 2004, the New Pension Scheme (NPS) was introduced for new recruits, shifting from a defined benefit model to a defined contribution model.
OPS was a Defined Benefit (DB) plan, meaning the pension amount was predetermined and guaranteed by the government.
Introduced in 2004, NPS is a Defined Contribution (DC) plan where both employee and employer contribute to a pension fund. Returns are market-linked.
Feature | OPS | NPS |
---|---|---|
Type | Defined Benefit (DB) | Defined Contribution (DC) |
Applicability | Employees who joined before 01.01.2004 | Mandatory for employees joining on/after 01.01.2004 |
Employee Contribution | Nil | 10% of Basic Pay + DA |
Government Contribution | Full liability | 14% (central govt.) |
Pension Amount | 50% of last drawn basic pay + DA | Based on corpus & market returns |
Inflation Protection | Yes (Dearness Relief) | No direct protection |
Family Pension | Yes | Yes (via annuity options) |
Financial Burden | High on govt. | Shared (employee + govt.) |
Tax Benefits | Limited | Extensive (80CCD) |
In recent years, states like Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, and Punjab have announced a return to OPS citing guaranteed pensions and employee welfare. Employee unions across India are demanding rollback of NPS.
However, financial experts and the central government argue that OPS is fiscally unsustainable in the long run, while NPS promotes a balanced, shared responsibility between the government and employees.